Home

The results of penetrating keratoplasty in endothelial corneal dystrophy using preserved donor material

Written by Zolotorevskiy A.V., Fedyashev G.A.

  UDK: 616.713–002.43–089.843 | Pages: 65–68 | Full text PDF | Open PDF 

Annotation:

Background. Research objective is an assessment of surgical and functional results of penetrating keratoplasty in endothelial corneal dysfunction using preserved donor transplant.
Methods. 15 patients (15 eyes) aged 55–83 with the secondary (postoperative) endothelial corneal dystrophy were got penetrating keratoplasty with the “Material for cornea recovery”, produced by eye bank “EyeLab” (Moscow).
Results. In all cases there was complete recovery of transplant transparency during 1–3 months. The medium density of the endothelium was 1741±234 cells/mm2, the medium loss of the endothelium – 18±9 %. Normalization of corneal thickness has occurred in 2–3 months after surgery.
Conclusions. The effectiveness of “Material for cornea recovery” for penetrating keratoplasty is not inferior to the efficacy of the native donor material.

Links to authors:

A.V. Zolotorevskiy1, G.A. Fedyashev2, 3
1 Eye bank “EyeLab” (5a Beryozovaya alley Moscow 127273 Russian Federation),
2 Primorsky center of eye microsurgery (100e Borisenko St. Vladivostok 690088 Russian Federation),
3 Pacific State Medical University (2 Ostryakova Ave. Vladivostok 690950 Russian Federation)


1. Volkov V.V., Dronov M.M. The development of surgical treatment of epithelial and endothelial corneal dystrophy // The 1st Meeting of Ophthalmological Transcaucasian Republics. Sukhumi, 1976. P. 150–165.
2. Dronov M.M. Guidance on keratoplasty. StP.: Vlazipress, 1997. 178 p. 3. Independent Bank of materials for keratoplasty [electronic resource]. URL: http:// http://eye-bank.ru/ (date of access: 04.18.2015).
4. Abou-Jaoude E.S., Brooks М., Katz D.G., Van Meter W.S. Spontaneous wound dehiscence after removal of single continuous penetrating keratoplasty suture // Ophthalmology 2002. Vol. 109. P. 1291–1296.
5. Al-Yousuf N., Mavrikakis I., Mavrikakis E., Daya S.M. Penetrating keratoplasty: indications over a 10 year period // British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2004. Vol. 88. P. 998–1001.
6. Borderie V., Sandali O., Bullet J. [et al.] Long-term results of deep anterior lamellar versus penetrating keratoplasty // Ophthalmology. 2012. Vol. 119 (2). P. 249–255.
7. Bourne W.M. Clinical estimation of corneal endothelial pump function // Trans. American Ophthalmol. Soc. 1998. Vol. 96. P. 229–239.
8. Cosar C.B., Sridhar M.S., Cohen E. J. [et al.] Indications for penetrating keratoplasty and associated procedures, 1996–2000 // Cornea. 2002. Vol. 21. P. 148–151.
9. Culbertson W.W., Abbott R.L., Forster R.K. Endothelial cell loss in penetrating keratoplasty // Ophthalmology. 1982. Vol. 89. P. 600–604.
10. Dobbins K.R.B., Price F.W., Whitson W.E. Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in the Midwestern United States // Cornea. 2000. Vol. 19. P.813-816.
11. Fasolo A., Capuzzo C., Fornea M. [et al.] Risk factors for graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty: 5-year follow-up from the corneal transplant epidemiological study// Cornea. 2011. Vol. 30. P. 1328–1335.
12. Krachmer J.H., Mannis M.J., Holland E.J. Cornea. Fundamentals, diagnosis and management: 2nd Edition. Elsevier–Mosby, 2005. Vol. 1. 1409 p.
13. Melles G.R., Eggink F., Lander F. A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty // Cornea. 1998. Vol. 17. P. 618–626.
14. Narayanan R., Gaster R.N., Kenney M.C. Pseudophakie corneal edema: a review of mechanisms and treatments // Cornea. 2006. Vol. 25, No. 9. P. 993–1004.
15. Waldock A., Cook S.D. Corneal transplantation: how successful are we? // British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2000. Vol. 84. P. 813–815.

PUBLISHER: "MEDITSYNA DV"

Founded in 1997  |  Editions in a year: 4, Articles in one issue: 30 |  ISSN of print version: 1609-1175  |  Ind.: 18410 (Agency "Rospechat’")  |  Edition: 1000 c.